4 of OpenRouter's Top 5 Models Are Open Source — The End of Proprietary Dominance
Four of the top five most-used models on OpenRouter are open source (Qwen3-Coder, DeepSeek R2, MiniMax M2.5, etc.). We analyze the end of proprietary model dominance and why open-source models are winning in real-world usage.
Overview
A remarkable shift has been observed in OpenRouter’s weekly usage rankings. Four out of the top five models are open source. Qwen3-Coder, DeepSeek R2, MiniMax M2.5, and others have taken over the leaderboard, signaling that the long-assumed dominance of proprietary models is crumbling.
This article analyzes the structural reasons why open-source models have surpassed proprietary ones in actual usage on OpenRouter.
OpenRouter Weekly Rankings: What Changed
TOP 5 Composition
According to data shared on Reddit’s r/LocalLLaMA community, the OpenRouter weekly usage TOP 5 is as follows:
| Rank | Model | Type | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen3-Coder | 🟢 OSS | Alibaba’s coding-specialized model |
| 2 | DeepSeek R2 | 🟢 OSS | Reasoning-focused large model |
| 3 | MiniMax M2.5 | 🟢 OSS | Cost-efficient general-purpose model |
| 4 | GPT-4.1 | 🔵 Proprietary | OpenAI’s flagship |
| 5 | Llama 4 Maverick | 🟢 OSS | Meta’s open-source large model |
The fact that 4 out of 5 are open source carries meaning beyond mere numbers — these are real developers paying real money making this choice.
Why OpenRouter Matters
OpenRouter provides access to various AI models through a single API. Users select models themselves and pay based on actual token usage. This ranking therefore reflects real-world usage preferences, not marketing or benchmarks.
5 Reasons Open-Source Models Are Winning
1. Overwhelming Cost Efficiency
Open-source models benefit from active competition among API providers, resulting in significantly lower costs for equivalent performance. Qwen3-Coder offers similar coding performance to GPT-4.1 at roughly 1/10th the price.
Cost Comparison (per 1M tokens, estimated):
┌─────────────────┬──────────┬──────────┐
│ Model │ Input │ Output │
├─────────────────┼──────────┼──────────┤
│ GPT-4.1 │ $2.00 │ $8.00 │
│ Qwen3-Coder │ $0.20 │ $0.60 │
│ DeepSeek R2 │ $0.30 │ $1.20 │
│ MiniMax M2.5 │ $0.15 │ $0.60 │
└─────────────────┴──────────┴──────────┘
2. The Performance Gap Has Vanished
Until 2024, GPT-4 held an overwhelming performance advantage. Through 2025-2026, open-source model capabilities improved dramatically:
- Qwen3-Coder: Matches or exceeds GPT-4.1 on coding benchmarks
- DeepSeek R2: Top-tier performance in math and reasoning with strong Chain-of-Thought capabilities
- MiniMax M2.5: Best cost-to-performance ratio for general tasks
3. Transparency and Customizability
Open-source models with public weights enable:
- Fine-tuning: Custom optimization for specific domains
- Local deployment: Ensuring data privacy
- Architecture understanding: Verifying model behavior
- Self-hosting: Building vendor-independent infrastructure
4. Aggressive Open-Source Strategy from Chinese AI Companies
Chinese AI companies like Alibaba (Qwen), DeepSeek, and MiniMax have adopted a strategy of releasing their best models as open source:
- Ecosystem preemption: Capturing developer communities
- API revenue model: Attracting users with open source, monetizing via cloud APIs
- Global influence expansion: Differentiating from Western proprietary models
5. Community-Driven Optimization
Open-source models are rapidly optimized by the community after release:
- Quantization: Cost reduction via GGUF, GPTQ, AWQ formats
- Inference optimization: High-performance engines like vLLM and TensorRT-LLM
- Adapter sharing: Domain specialization through LoRA adapters
Remaining Strengths of Proprietary Models
Despite the open-source surge, proprietary models still hold advantages in certain areas:
- Multimodal integration: Vision and voice capabilities of GPT-4o, Gemini
- Enterprise support: SLAs, compliance, technical support
- Safety filtering: Enterprise-grade safety guardrails
- Cutting-edge research: New architectural innovations still originate from major labs
However, even these advantages are being rapidly caught up by the open-source community.
Industry Impact
graph TD
A[OSS Model Performance Gains] --> B[OpenRouter Usage Growth]
A --> C[API Price Competition]
B --> D[Proprietary Model Share Decline]
C --> D
D --> E[OpenAI/Anthropic Strategy Shifts]
E --> F[Price Cuts or Differentiation]
A --> G[Local Deployment Growth]
G --> H[Data Sovereignty]
Implications for Developers
- Adopt multi-model strategies: Avoid single-vendor lock-in using routers like OpenRouter
- Optimize costs: Select the best model per task (coding → Qwen3-Coder, reasoning → DeepSeek R2)
- Consider local deployment: Self-host open-source models for sensitive data processing
- Engage with the community: Share and leverage quantization and fine-tuning results
Conclusion
Four open-source models occupying the OpenRouter weekly TOP 5 is not a momentary blip. It’s a paradigm shift driven by five structural factors: cost efficiency, performance parity, customizability, aggressive Chinese corporate strategies, and community optimization.
Proprietary models won’t disappear, but the equation “best performance = proprietary” has already been broken. The future AI ecosystem is entering an era where practicality and cost efficiency are the core criteria for model selection.
References
Was this helpful?
Your support helps me create better content. Buy me a coffee! ☕